“America is, and always will be, a shining City on a Hill.” – Ronald Reagan
Take the ‘Racist Xenophobe’ Quiz!
If quotas on immigration are an essential tool for protecting us Americans from being terrorized on our own soil, why do we still have no quotas on foreigners who come to America as visitors? Must someone be a resident of the U.S. in order to unleash terror in America?
Voice of Capitalism
Our weekly email newsletter.
We respect your privacy. Unsubscribe anytime.
How and why governments have used the power of issuing official travel documents as a means of restricting the free movement of people during the last 200 years.
America! The word has meant hope, opportunity and freedom for tens of millions of people over the last two and half centuries. For a good part of those 250 years, the words on the Stature of Liberty in New York harbor have rang true: "Give me your tired, your poor,...
The Democratic Party’s changing position on illegal immigration is based on the lust for political power over moral principle.
At one time, Democrats all warned about the problems associated with illegal immigration.
In the name of individual rights, we should dismantle the entire bureaucracy of immigration restrictions
Do all people have a right to immigrate to the U.S.?
How today’s widespread acceptance of determinism has made many people suspicious of immigration.
There are many economic fallacies that surround the issue of freer or open immigration into the United States, and few of them can stand up to serious critical examination.
America was once a “melting pot” of a diversity peoples that over several generations become something different from their ancestors’ national origins: they became Americans.
Obama may think of himself as a citizen of the world, but he was elected President of the United States, not head of a world government, and that does not authorize him to gamble the lives of Americans for the benefit of people in other countries.
Europe provides a valuable lesson for Americans — on what not to do.
There was a painful irony when France’s immediate response to the terrorist attacks in Paris was to close the borders. If they had closed the borders decades ago, they might have avoided this attack.
No nation has an unlimited capacity to absorb immigrants of any sort, and especially immigrants whose cultures are not simply different, but antagonistic, to the values of the society in which they settle.
A proper screening for immigrants does not include ideology, but screens for rights violating actions.
The idea of a completely open border with nothing but a welcome sign would represent a violation of government’s obligation to protect individuals from foreign threats.
It would be good if all immigrants came here legally. But America makes that difficult.
People who entered the United States illegally may be called “undocumented” in politically correct circles, but what is all too well documented is the utter irresponsibility of both political parties in dealing with immigration issues.
Europe is currently in the process of paying the price for years of importing millions of people from a culture hostile to the fundamental values of Western culture.
If immigration laws are, as I hold, violations of individual rights, it is up to the courts, not the President, to determine that.
What happens when the immigrant does that, goes to the U.S. embassy and says, I’d like to work in America legally?
Dr. Yaron Brook, president of the Ayn Rand Center for Individual Rights, calls for an open immigration policy, saying that the government’s only function should be to protect individual rights.