Is a proposed federal wealth tax on the ultra-rich the solution to America’s budget-deficit woes?
George Soros and his son Alexander Soros, Facebook co-founder Chris Hughes, heiress Abigail Disney and “Anonymous” are free to give their wealth to politicians right now.
There’s nothing moral, “fair” or “progressive” about a graduated (communist) tax schedule.
Opponents of tax cuts do not want justice. They want redistribution of wealth
Do we leave (wealth) in the private sector where the market decides? Or do we subject it to corrupt politicians?
Some 45 percent of American households, nearly 78 million individuals, have no federal income tax obligation.
The world of plunder can be replaced with a community of free people pursuing mutually beneficial peaceful production.
This tax reform appears to have been designed primarily to help secure future funding for a large, and growing, welfare state. Is this really what most Republicans in Congress wanted?
Taxing corporate income doesn’t benefit but hurts workers while discouraging investment.
Unlike most prior tax cuts, the Trump version does not even make any attempt to balance the cuts with corresponding cuts in government spending.