There’s nothing moral, “fair” or “progressive” about a graduated (communist) tax schedule.
Opponents of tax cuts do not want justice. They want redistribution of wealth
Do we leave (wealth) in the private sector where the market decides? Or do we subject it to corrupt politicians?
Some 45 percent of American households, nearly 78 million individuals, have no federal income tax obligation.
The world of plunder can be replaced with a community of free people pursuing mutually beneficial peaceful production.
Taxing corporate income doesn’t benefit but hurts workers while discouraging investment.
Unlike most prior tax cuts, the Trump version does not even make any attempt to balance the cuts with corresponding cuts in government spending.
Those who think that government collecting taxes from those who are productive to give them to those who are not is just, do so because they have accepted the morality of altruism and egalitarianism and believe that statism is the ideal social system.
According to estimates by the Tax Policy Center, slightly over 45 percent of American households have no federal income tax liability.
Plans to “soak the rich,” who are not paying their “fair share,” have worked politically, time and time again — and may well work yet again in the 2016 elections.