The goal of the systemic racism crusaders isn’t the elimination of racism.
Investors should be proud of what they do.
The advocates of “tenants’ rights” imply that tenants have rights that are separate and distinct from landlords and other individuals.
Modern-day Luddites oppose a different type of progress—gentrification.
Historic preservation is a pretense for dictating how others may or may not use their property.
Many attempts to defend property rights are founded on the wrong premises. The result, unfortunately, is ultimately destructive to the cause.
Do as I say, or else you will be fined or sent to prison.
To this day, private companies are castigated for “predatory lending.” Yet, it was government policy that incentivized loans to those who couldn’t afford to repay them.
A movement is underway to pressure the Biden Administration to waive global intellectual property (IP) rights to COVID vaccines developed in the United States.
When politicians announce a new program or policy, they tell us of all the great benefits that will result.
Widespread racism can only occur when government mandates it.
Government officials love to loudly proclaim the great benefits that tenants will enjoy by restricting and controlling landlords. The folly of their schemes will become clear when they discover that the landlord shrugged.
Like all forms of subsidies, the “right to return” takes from some—taxpayers—to provide benefits to others—low-income households.
The report on eviction filings looks at groups, not individuals. Consequently, it fails to identify the context for the individuals who were evicted.
If we unleash the swarm, if we restore freedom to property owners, we will see an immense increase in housing production. Property owners could convert single-family homes into duplexes, build a cottage or “granny flat” in the back yard, or do any number of other things to increase the supply of housing.
The only difference between the Biden version of fascism and the conservative version is whose property they seek to control.
If Cruz really wants parents, and all Americans, to have freedom of choice, he should call for the abolition of the FDA.
Forcing companies to allow content is the flip side of prohibiting them from expressing certain ideas. These are the two side of the censorship coin.
Housing activists think that the solution to the housing shortage is to shackle housing producers.
We can’t predict what solutions and innovations that free individuals will discover. However, we do know that free individuals, and only free individuals, can and do find solutions and innovations.
In 2024, voter in Los Angeles will vote on an initiative that would force hotel operators to rent vacant rooms to the city’s homeless.
Like this content? Subscribe to support our work — it's free.
Read by students, professors, and citizens, Capitalism Magazine provides over 9,000 free to read articles and essays from pro-reason, individual rights perspective. 100% independent.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.