Motion Picture Academy “Diversity” Guidelines are Based on The Wrong Premise

by | Sep 22, 2020 | Movies

Actors should be judged on their acting, and movies should be judged on their overall quality.

As you may have heard, the Motion Picture Academy just announced new “diversity guidelines” for best picture contenders.  While I applaud the motion picture industry moving beyond stories about straight white people, I think these guidelines are profoundly misguided.  Actors should be judged on their acting, and movies should be judged on their overall quality.  Part of that quality certainly involves appropriate casting, but trying to police “diversity” in this way is going to make an already subjective process even more political and even less about the art.

Let’s look at a recent example: actor Henry Golding (Crazy Rich Asians) is getting criticized for playing a gay male character in his latest movie, Monsoon.  It wasn’t that long ago that straight actors were lauded for their “bravery” in taking on gay roles.  But now, as part of an emerging trend, the purveyors of identity politics want only gay actors to play gay roles, only deaf actors to play deaf characters, only disabled…well, you get the drift.

As a writer/director of several LGBT movies, I have cast both gay and straight actors to play gay roles.  I have also cast actors I thought were straight, but who turned out to be gay or bisexual when I got to know them better. Frankly, I don’t think it’s appropriate to quiz actors about their sex life before casting them.  It’s not my business, and it doesn’t have any relevance to the job I’m asking them to do.

What’s more, how would this even play out if we take these identitarians seriously?  Alfred Kinsey discovered back in the 1940s that over a third of the men he studied had had sexual experiences with another male.  The vast majority of these people did not identify as gay.  So, would a teenage handjob from your buddy be enough to qualify an actor to play a gay role?  What about the guy you got drunk and kissed his roommate on a dare?  Or what about the actor who has only ever dated women, but considers himself “open” to all experiences?

” I don’t think it’s appropriate to quiz actors about their sex life before casting them.  It’s not my business, and it doesn’t have any relevance to the job I’m asking them to do. “

Women may be even more sexually fluid than men.  So who gets to play a lesbian?  Can an actress who’s only ever slept with men, but once had a weird, disturbing dream about her best friend play one?  What if she’s made out with a friend, but not had actual sex?  And who should verify all this?  Is self-identification all that’s required?  What about gay actors who aren’t ready to come out?  Are they forbidden from playing gay roles until they do?  In the meantime, is it wrong for them to play straight roles?  Certainly, that shouldn’t be allowed once they’ve come out, right?  I personally don’t know very many gay actors who would take that deal.

No one wants to return to the days of Mickey Rooney in yellow-face (“Breakfast at Tiffany’s”).  But identity politics can be problematic even with regards to race, let alone sexuality.  In Monsoon, Henry Golding plays a man of Vietnamese descent.  In reality, Golding is half English and half Malaysian.  Should that be allowed?  In our increasingly cosmopolitan and global society, a growing percentage of the population are, like Golding, mixed race.  In my last movie, “Say Yes,” I cast a man who was half Filipino and half white to play a character who was half Mexican and half white.  Was that wrong?  He did a great job in the role.  Should I have held out for someone who was, in fact, half Latino?  What if no such actor auditioned for the role?  You don’t have to go very far before it gets absurd.

Casting a movie is a difficult process.  You want to get the best actor, but you also want someone who is physically right for the role.  Then there’s the chemistry factor with the other actors.  On top of that, there’s the consideration of box office appeal.  Henry Golding is a movie star.  He’s not gay and he’s not Vietnamese, but he is gorgeous and a talented actor.  Requiring the filmmakers to cast a gay actor of Vietnamese descent would have likely resulted (if the film got made at all) in a movie you never heard of.  And how does that help LGBT representation?

In my opinion, the best thing you can do for minority actors (including gay actors) is to give them a fair shake.  By all means, think outside the box and cast creatively.  But let’s not start policing representation and assuming we know the options the filmmakers had available.  Judge movies on their creative merits, not their level of political correctness.

Stewart Wade Margolis is a writer, filmmaker, and intellectual activist who champions the virtue of rationality. Visit his website at

The views expressed above represent those of the author and do not necessarily represent the views of the editors and publishers of Capitalism Magazine. Capitalism Magazine sometimes publishes articles we disagree with because we think the article provides information, or a contrasting point of view, that may be of value to our readers.

Related articles

Netflix Delivers Salvo for Free Expression

Netflix Delivers Salvo for Free Expression

With Nine Little Words to Employees: ‘Netflix May Not Be the Best Place for You.’ Netflix is no longer trying to please everyone, and that’s a win for free expression.

The Academy Awards Rewards Violence

The Academy Awards Rewards Violence

The distinction evaded in the condemnation of Chris Rock’s joke and the apologetics for Will Smith’s act of violence is the difference between speech and physical force.

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Pin It on Pinterest