Books: The Moral Case for Finance

by | Nov 10, 2017

The essential moral case for finance that Brook and Watkins present is that finance is good by the standard of human flourishing.

I have just finished reading recently published In pursuit of wealth: The moral case for finance, edited by Yaron Brook and Don Watkins. It is a collection of 14 new and previously published essays that provides a moral defense for finance—which plays a crucial role in in human flourishing and prosperity.

Moral Case for FinanceSuch a defense is sorely needed today, as finance is one of the most poorly understood, and therefore despised, industries today (as it has been  throughout its history). Many people view financiers—hedge fund managers, bankers and even insurance industry employees—as dangerous, or at best, useless gamblers that risk our money for their own profits. Hence the derogatory label “casino economy” that is often used to describe the financial industry in my native country, Finland.

Yet, as Brook and Watson explain, finance is one of the most fundamental industries without which most of the material values we benefit from, from the products of Apple and services of Uber, would not exist. For companies to develop, produce, and sell products and services that we need and want, they need capital, in the form of either debt (from banks or other lenders) or equity (from private investors or through the stock market).

Without capital, there would not be many products or services. As Brook and Watkins explain, without Mike Markkula investing about $250,000 of his own wealth in Apple when Steve Jobs first started creating the company, we likely wouldn’t have any of the Apple products today. This applies equally to any entrepreneur pursuing their dream of developing a value-creating business. Likewise, pharmaceutical companies would not be able develop many of the life-saving or life-altering drugs without the billions of dollars they raise through the stock market.

Without finance, there would be no bank loans or mortgages for us, which would mean postponed ownership of vehicles, homes or other large purchases, nor insurance to reduce the risks we face.

The essential moral case for finance that Brook and Watkins present is that finance is good by the standard of human flourishing. It enables us to obtain material values that make our lives safer, healthier, longer, more enjoyable. Finance also allows us to accumulate wealth through saving and investment that makes us more prosperous and enables us to live in more comfort.

Finance makes all this possible because financiers are productive. They don’t just “move papers around” or gamble with our money: they allocate capital to its most productive uses where it earns the best possible return and therefore creates the most wealth.

Brook and Watkins’ book consists of 14 essays, in three sections: How finances helps us flourish, The “inequality” attack on finance, and Financial controversies. The sections contain five, five, and four essays, respectively. The book ends with Don Watkins’ interview with Yaron Brook who used to be a professor of finance in his former career. Brook and Watkins are also the main contributors of the essays, either together or individually. There is one essay, ‘The dubious origins and purpose of central banking,’ by Raymond C. Niles in the first section. In the third section, Doug Altner contributes one essay, ‘John Allison on how Dodd-Frank is smothering small business.’

In their title essay, Brook and Watkins explain the production-boosting and consumption-increasing functions of finance, as well as its role is managing financial risk (through insurance, credit, diversification, and derivatives). They also make clear the benefits of private equity, hedge funds, and investment banks, while busting the myths that  finance creates instability in the markets and win-lose transactions (where presumably only the financiers would win).

In the first section there is also an excellent analysis by Don Watkins on the history of the destructive influence of government interference in the financial industry, ‘Finance isn’t free and never really was.’ Yaron Brook’s description of the history of money lending is equally illuminating.

The second section counters the different claims that economic equality is moral, and the third section covers various financial controversies such as index funds and insider trading and defends them as moral. The last section also busts the myth that tax payers subsidize banker bonuses. The interview of Yaron provides an epilogue for the book, well summarized in this quotation:

“Hedge fund managers and other financiers who earn lots of money as a result of productive achievement have done something right. They are the ones making markets efficient and directing capital where it is most needed. They are making money for themselves and their clients and helping to make sure that innovators like Steve Jobs and Jeff Bezos can provide us with all the amazing things that make up our incredible standard of living.”

Now available on Amazon:
The Moral Case for Finance
Only $3.99 on Kindle

Jaana Woiceshyn teaches business ethics and competitive strategy at the Haskayne School of Business, University of Calgary, Canada. How to Be Profitable and Moral” is her first solo-authored book. Visit her website at

The views expressed above represent those of the author and do not necessarily represent the views of the editors and publishers of Capitalism Magazine. Capitalism Magazine sometimes publishes articles we disagree with because we think the article provides information, or a contrasting point of view, that may be of value to our readers.

Have a comment?

Post your response in our Capitalism Community on X.

Related articles

The Meaning of Americanism

The Meaning of Americanism

Review of “What America Is: The Moral Logic of the American Revolution and Other Essays” by C. Bradley Thompson (2023).

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Pin It on Pinterest