By clearly and publicly withdrawing their moral sanction of government’s freedom-curtailing and welfare-destroying actions, business leaders can have a big impact on all of our future.

Bad Business: The Moral Sanction of the Regulatory State

by | Nov 19, 2016 | Business

All tax payers are suffering under the increasing regulatory and tax burden, as governments are trying to cope with the sagging economies (that they themselves have created). Business is particularly under attack, as the major funder of governments’ spending schemes. Take Canada for an example, where the leftist Liberal government just delivered its second fiscal update: economic growth has declined and government revenue is down, despite significant ‘stimulus’ spending. In a futile effort to combat the malaise of the economy, the government has employed its trusted—and destructive—tools: increased spending and debt, and of course, increased taxes, such as the new carbon tax.

Despite all the historical evidence that has proven government ‘stimulus’ spending and debt accumulation hurting rather than helping economic growth and prosperity, the Canadian government has embraced the role of the steward of the economy (and the savior of the environment). While using all the weapons in its arsenal to chase away business investment—increased taxes, more environmental and other regulations, restrictions on foreign investment (due to economic nationalism), and restrictions on competition and development (think pipelines)—the government also claims to recognize that private investment is essential.

But instead of doing the right thing to improve the economic well-being of Canadians by liberalizing the economy and thus attracting private investment, the government has increased its intrusion through new initiatives. As Trevor Tombe reports in an informative Financial Post column, over $200 million has been allocated to a futile marketing effort, “Invest in Canada Hub,” to attract foreign investment. Also in the Financial Post, Lawrence Solomon reports a similar new initiative: a government-owned Canada Infrastructure Bank, for foreign investment in Canadian infrastructure.

All this makes the economic future of Canadians gloomy indeed. Can anything be done, given that the economic situation is similar in many parts of the world? As individual citizens, we can always try to influence political decision makers by letter writing, the social media, and talking to others to point out the freedom-curtailing and welfare-destroying actions of government, so that they can also try influence politicians, even in between elections.

However, businesses can have much more impact on the government policies than private citizens. The CEOs of major corporations in particular have the ear of the government. From what I hear, the Liberal government is eager to consult business leaders (although whether it would act on their advice when contradictory to government’s ideology, is uncertain). And even smaller businesses can have an impact through their industry or other associations.

Or, if in a sheltered position, such as the telecom companies and airlines, they short-sightedly endorse the government restrictions on competition and requirements of Canadian ownership.

But by morally sanctioning and even advocating the tax-and-spend regulatory state—such as those oil industry leaders who apparently approached the government in Alberta, asking for carbon taxes and emission caps, in effect apologizing for the existence of their industry—businesses are paving the way for their own demise and destroying the prospect for more liberty and economic prosperity for all of us.

The only way to reverse the course of economic decline in Canada and elsewhere is to get the governments to liberalize the economies by doing all the things Tombe and Solomon suggest in their columns: cutting corporate taxes, lifting restrictions on development, increasing competition, and opening markets.

By clearly and publicly withdrawing their moral sanction of government’s freedom-curtailing and welfare-destroying actions, business leaders can have a big impact on all of our future. While speaking up is important, actions speak even louder. Moving investment and operations away from Canada (or within Canada) to jurisdictions where more economic freedom can still be found, such as in Asia (and Saskatchewan), will eventually get the message even to governments most committed to anti-freedom and anti-human ideology.

Economic freedom rests on political freedom: the protection of individual rights to life, liberty, property and pursuit of happiness. They are the underlying principle that business people, the government, and the rest of us must embrace—if long-term success and flourishing is what we want.

Jaana Woiceshyn teaches business ethics and competitive strategy at the Haskayne School of Business, University of Calgary, Canada. How to Be Profitable and Moral” is her first solo-authored book. Visit her website at profitableandmoral.com.

View all articles by author >

The views expressed represent those of the author and do not necessarily represent the views of the editors and publishers of Capitalism Magazine.

1 Comment

  1. This stuff’s been going on since the beginning of history. I think archeology and paleontology tells us it’s been going on since the beginning of human existence, unencumbered, despite some great advances in philosophy and knowledge in general.

    Today, why should we have physical tolerance and patience with it? We’ve been yapping at those in power, for millennia, to do something about it. We, thus, tell them what they must know to do the opposite. That’s because they don’t have the moral perspective, because they know that perspective, but deliberately reject it, in cold blood. So, they don’t have morality, but hold to altruism, the crime from pre-history.

    What do we do in the face of that? Do we keep yapping at them, or give up and lay down, with the same non-results from human origins, or do we do something else, which has been done a few times before, with temporary success?

    Today, if we do that something else, we know how to make it permanent, in perpetuity this time, with endless vigilance thru every generation. Mike Kevitt

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published.

Pin It on Pinterest

Share This

If you found this useful please share it.