Hillary Clinton’s Armor

by | May 6, 2015 | POLITICS, Women's Rights

Inside the Clinton scandal manual.
Source: Donkey Hotey (cc/atrib)

Source: Donkey Hotey (cc/atrib)

“This vast right-wing conspiracy,” Hillary Clinton said, “has been conspiring against my husband since the day he announced.” That was the “feminist” first lady’s response when her husband was accused of having sex with a 21-year-old.

Bill was more lawyerly. He said things like, “It depends upon what the meaning of the word ‘is’ is.”

The Wall Street Journal’s Kim Strassel suggests that the Clintons must have a Scandal Manual: “The standard operating procedure never changes.”

Forty years ago, Hillary would have us believe that she wasn’t just the wife of a man running for Arkansas governor — she was a lucky or brilliant investor who in less than three weeks doubled her money. No, tripled! No, wait — quadrupled … no, actually, much more!

“Clinton made almost $100,000 in the cattle futures market,” reported Tom Brokaw, and “many wondered whether that was a sweetheart deal arranged for the governor’s wife.”

Of course it was.

In less than three weeks, Hillary turned $1,000 into $16,427. “I don’t understand how that could have possibly occurred,” she said. “My husband and I missed the fact that we had actually made some money.”

A hundred thousand dollars — twice what her husband made as governor. Who remembers trivia like that?

That was around the time of the Whitewater scandal, in which friends of the Clintons got sweetheart land deals. Seven people went to jail, but not the Clintons. Their records disappeared.

Hillary came on “20/20.” Barbara Walters asked her, “How did you get into this mess where your whole credibility is being questioned?”

Hillary answered sweetly, “I ask myself that every day, Barbara, because it’s very surprising and confusing to me.”

It is confusing to me, too.

Travelgate and Fostergate were also confusing, as is the Democrats’ sudden indifference to a president getting oral sex from an intern, deaths in Benghazi and, most recently, violation of State Department email rules.

“It would’ve been better for me to use two separate phones and two email accounts,” Hillary testified. “I thought using one device would be simpler.”

Except it turned out she did use two devices: “iPhone, OK, in full disclosure, and a Blackberry.”

She also said, “I took the unprecedented step of asking that the State Department make all my work-related emails public.”

Except that wasn’t true either. She turned over only emails she claimed were relevant. The rest were wiped clean from her home server — a private server government officials aren’t supposed to use. Then she refused to give that server to a third party for an independent review.

Consequences? Punishment? No.

New revelations in the book “Clinton Cash” about the Clinton Foundation accepting billions from foreign governments and people doing business with our government brought out the same “Aw, shucks” replies from the Scandal Manual.

Bill told a reporter, “I asked Hillary about this, and she said, ‘No one’s ever tried to influence me.'”

Anyway, the Foundation money went to charity. Hillary said, “I am very proud of the work the Foundation does.”

But what “work”? In 2013, a measly 9 percent of the money went to charity! Charity Navigator, the biggest charity rating service, won’t even list the Clinton Foundation in its rankings. This is repulsive. If a Republican candidate ran a charity that did that, it would be a scandal. But the Clintons must be immune.

Brian Williams “misremembers” his helicopter coming under hostile fire and loses his job. But Hillary says, “I remember landing under sniper fire … we just ran with our heads down to get into the vehicles.” That was total fabrication, but when Hillary was caught, she just told reporters it was a “minor blip.”

“I say a lot of things — millions of words a day — so if I misspoke, that was just a misstatement.”

Misstatement? I call it a self-promoting lie. But the Clintons are Teflon. In the presidential race, Betfair lists Hillary as the overwhelming favorite.

“Political language,” George Orwell wrote, “is designed to make lies sound truthful and murder respectable, and to give an appearance of solidity to pure wind.”


  1. Good summary, Mr. Stossel.

    I’m sure that more detail will come to light as the election cycle continues to grind towards November 2016.

    Bad as “America’s ex-wife” truly is, who else does the National Socialist Democrat American Party (NSDAP) have to put up against her?

  2. Wow, you make it sound like there’s something totally political about everything Hillary has done! It’s almost like actual misdeeds or ugly facts are irrelevant, unless they can be absolutely proven, and if they ultimately are it’s so much later that they no longer matter. Hillary is so busy grasping at progressive political winds as she tries to formulate what her presidency would actually be about, she has to be getting dizzy.

  3. Well, when there’s not even a shred of evidence anywhere…When it comes to the Clinton’s I have to go check the dictionary and add to it. A shred now means an “enormous and great amount.” Or do I have Barack Obama to thank for that one? Hmm…

  4. Bernie Sanders

  5. Ha ha! You people do blame everything on Barack Obama! Or were you trying to be humorous? You definitely made me laugh.

  6. You need to remove the reference to Benghazi. You know it is a cheap shot. If your article cannot stand without it, so be it. But Hillary Clinton is NOT responsible for Benghazi and her statement “What does it matter now”? was taken wholly out of context and used to inflame millions of people against our president.

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published.

John Stossel is author of No They Can't! Why Government Fails — But Individuals Succeed. For other Creators Syndicate writers and cartoonists, visit www.creators.com.


What do you think?

We are always interested in rational feedback and criticism. Feel free to share your thoughts using this form.

We will post responses that we think are of interest to our readers in our Letters section.

Help Capitalism Magazine get the pro-capitalist message out.

With over 10,000 articles readable online Capitalism Magazine is completely free. We rely on the generosity of our readers to keep us going. So if you already donate to us, thank you! And if you don’t, please do consider making a donation today. One-off donations – or better yet, monthly donations – are hugely appreciated. You can find out more here. Thank you!

Related Articles

When Reason is Out, Violence is In

When Reason is Out, Violence is In

What explains today’s bi-partisan violence? When reason is out, persuasion and peaceful assembly-protest also are out. What remains is emotionalism – and violence.

Voice of Capitalism

Free email weekly newsletter.

You have Successfully Subscribed!

Pin It on Pinterest