Why Is It Moral to Pay CEOs 300 Times More Than Average Employees?

by | Mar 23, 2012 | Business

The compensation of Chief Executive Officers of large American corporations is about 300 times more than that of the average employee. Such a big gap in pay is often criticized as immoral and is generally attributed to “greed” or to general unfairness of the “system.” I argue that such large differences in compensation are moral […]

The compensation of Chief Executive Officers of large American corporations is about 300 times more than that of the average employee. Such a big gap in pay is often criticized as immoral and is generally attributed to “greed” or to general unfairness of the “system.”

I argue that such large differences in compensation are moral (provided, of course, that a company’s financial performance has demonstrably improved while the CEO has been at the helm). Why? The CEO’s contribution to a company’s performance is much more significant than that of the average employee who works on some narrow aspect of operations, such assembling products or selling them to customers. While each employee’s contribution is important, it is the CEO who sets the direction and strategy for the company and builds the organization to carry them out. Without a CEO as their leader, the employees would not know which tasks to perform.

It is the CEO who is responsible for the company’s performance and is accountable to its shareholders. These are big tasks, and if performed well, of great value to shareholders who gain a significant return on their investment in the company. Besides being just, it is in the shareholders’ self-interest to compensate their company’s well-performing CEO at the level that entices him to stay with the company and to continue creating value for its owners.

The market for CEOs of large corporations is small, and this explains why the CEO compensation is so high. (The pool of people who are capable and willing to take on the demands of the job of a CEO, particularly in today’s environment of ever-expanding government regulation of business, is limited.)

If companies do not pay market salaries to their CEOs, they will lose them to competitors or to companies in other industries. This is a fact that compensation committees of boards of directors cannot ignore—if they want to attract and retain talented CEOs who keep creating value for shareholders.

Jaana Woiceshyn teaches business ethics and competitive strategy at the Haskayne School of Business, University of Calgary, Canada. How to Be Profitable and Moral” is her first solo-authored book. Visit her website at profitableandmoral.com.

The views expressed above represent those of the author and do not necessarily represent the views of the editors and publishers of Capitalism Magazine. Capitalism Magazine sometimes publishes articles we disagree with because we think the article provides information, or a contrasting point of view, that may be of value to our readers.

Related articles

Business Schools Undermine Wealth Creation

Business Schools Undermine Wealth Creation

Students should be reminded that money-making is not an evil endeavor when done ethically and efficiently, and productive pursuits do not need to be tasked with tackling societal ills.

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Pin It on Pinterest