A Solution to the Postal Crisis

by | Mar 2, 2012

Congress continues to fiddle while the United States Postal Service (USPS) burns. The union for postal employees is upset that the postmaster general wants to cut 35,000 jobs. Many Americans are upset that the USPS wants to close 3,700 post offices. The postmaster general warns that the USPS will lose up to $18 billion by […]

Congress continues to fiddle while the United States Postal Service (USPS) burns. The union for postal employees is upset that the postmaster general wants to cut 35,000 jobs. Many Americans are upset that the USPS wants to close 3,700 post offices. The postmaster general warns that the USPS will lose up to $18 billion by 2015 if drastic action isn’t taken. So, I will offer some advice that should make everyone happy.

First, repeal all laws that limit, control, or prohibit the actions of private mail delivery companies, including the private express statutes and mailbox access restrictions.

Second, sell the postal service to the postal employees union. (I personally wouldn’t even care if it was given to them.) The union and postal bureaucrats believe that they can save the postal service. Let them prove it, but without the benefit of a government protected monopoly.

Under this plan, the union could decide whether to keep unprofitable post offices open and risk bankruptcy. The union could decide which is more important–keeping incompetent employees or making a profit.

Consumers would have more choices, better service, and lower prices in a competitive environment. Taxpayers won’t be on the hook for bailing out another pseudo-government agency.

Of course, Congress won’t follow my advice. They aren’t interested in protecting freedom. They are only interested in pandering to special interests and their constituents.

Brian Phillips is the founder of the Texas Institute for Property Rights. Brian has been defending property rights for nearly thirty years. He played a key role in defeating zoning in Houston, Texas, and in Hobbs, New Mexico. He is the author of three books: Individual Rights and Government Wrongs, The Innovator Versus the Collective, and Principles and Property Rights. Visit his website at texasipr.com.

The views expressed above represent those of the author and do not necessarily represent the views of the editors and publishers of Capitalism Magazine. Capitalism Magazine sometimes publishes articles we disagree with because we think the article provides information, or a contrasting point of view, that may be of value to our readers.

Have a comment?

Post your response in our Capitalism Community on X.

Related articles

Misunderstanding the Meaning of a “Monopoly”

Misunderstanding the Meaning of a “Monopoly”

As long as government secures and protects private property rights, enforces all contracts entered into voluntarily and through mutual agreement, and assures law and order under an impartial rule of law, “monopoly” as an economic or social problem is virtually non-existent. But introduce government intervention into the market system, and monopoly invariably becomes a social harm and an economic problem.

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Pin It on Pinterest