A Solution to the Postal Crisis

by | Mar 2, 2012 | Antitrust

Congress continues to fiddle while the United States Postal Service (USPS) burns. The union for postal employees is upset that the postmaster general wants to cut 35,000 jobs. Many Americans are upset that the USPS wants to close 3,700 post offices. The postmaster general warns that the USPS will lose up to $18 billion by […]

Congress continues to fiddle while the United States Postal Service (USPS) burns. The union for postal employees is upset that the postmaster general wants to cut 35,000 jobs. Many Americans are upset that the USPS wants to close 3,700 post offices. The postmaster general warns that the USPS will lose up to $18 billion by 2015 if drastic action isn’t taken. So, I will offer some advice that should make everyone happy.

First, repeal all laws that limit, control, or prohibit the actions of private mail delivery companies, including the private express statutes and mailbox access restrictions.

Second, sell the postal service to the postal employees union. (I personally wouldn’t even care if it was given to them.) The union and postal bureaucrats believe that they can save the postal service. Let them prove it, but without the benefit of a government protected monopoly.

Under this plan, the union could decide whether to keep unprofitable post offices open and risk bankruptcy. The union could decide which is more important–keeping incompetent employees or making a profit.

Consumers would have more choices, better service, and lower prices in a competitive environment. Taxpayers won’t be on the hook for bailing out another pseudo-government agency.

Of course, Congress won’t follow my advice. They aren’t interested in protecting freedom. They are only interested in pandering to special interests and their constituents.

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published.

Brian Phillips has been actively defending individual rights for the past twenty-five years. He has successfully helped defeat attempts to implement zoning in Houston, Texas, and Hobbs, New Mexico. His writing has appeared in The Freeman, Reason, The Orange County Register, The Houston Chronicle, The Objective Standard, Capitalism Magazine, and dozens of other publications. He is the author of Individual Rights and Government Wrongs

SHOW PROFILE

What do you think?

We are always interested in rational feedback and criticism. Feel free to share your thoughts using this form.

We will post responses that we think are of interest to our readers in our Letters section.

Help Capitalism Magazine get the pro-capitalist message out.

With over 10,000 articles readable online Capitalism Magazine is completely free. We rely on the generosity of our readers to keep us going. So if you already donate to us, thank you! And if you don’t, please do consider making a donation today. One-off donations – or better yet, monthly donations – are hugely appreciated. You can find out more here. Thank you!

Related Articles

Google is Not a Coercive Monopoly

Google is Not a Coercive Monopoly

“Monopoly” means either “the only firm in an industry” or “a firm with explicit, government-granted privileges that prevent other people from competing with it.” Google doesn’t fit the bill.

Voice of Capitalism

Free email weekly newsletter.

You have Successfully Subscribed!

Pin It on Pinterest