More Microsoft Antitrust Suit Insanity

by | Jul 16, 2007 | Antitrust & Monopolies

According to the Onalaska Life Newspaper, millions of dollars worth of vouchers that were part of Microsoft’s settlement of a Wisconsin class-action antitrust case remain unclaimed. The settlement requires Microsoft to make available to class members up to $223,896,000 in vouchers that may be used to purchase new desktop computers, laptops, tablet computers, pre-packaged software, […]

According to the Onalaska Life Newspaper, millions of dollars worth of vouchers that were part of Microsoft’s settlement of a Wisconsin class-action antitrust case remain unclaimed.

The settlement requires Microsoft to make available to class members up to $223,896,000 in vouchers that may be used to purchase new desktop computers, laptops, tablet computers, pre-packaged software, printers, scanners, monitors, keyboards and pointing devices. Those products can be from any manufacturer, not just Microsoft.

Under the terms of the settlement, consumers, businesses and Wisconsin state and local governments who purchased Microsoft Windows, Word, Excel, Office, MS-DOS, Works Suite or Home Essentials, or a computer with any of those products pre-installed, between Dec. 7, 1993, and April 30, 2003, for use in Wisconsin is eligible to submit a claim for benefits. [. . .]

To date, Wisconsin class members have submitted approximately 54,000 claim forms; of those, approximately 4,000 were filed online at the court-approved settlement Web site, www.microsoftWISuit.com.

So as part of its settlement, Microsoft gives free money to any of its Wisconsin customers who declare that they purchased a Microsoft product between 1993 and 2003, yet there are only 54,000 takers and millions of dollars of the settlement money remains unclaimed. Apparently the vast majority of Microsoft’s Wisconsin customers do not feel themselves misused enough by the company to collect their vouchers.

Lest you think there is a silver lining in all of this, under the terms of the settlement, half of the uncollected settlement money will be given to the Wisconsin public schools. Furthermore, the class action attorneys will get their piece of Microsoft’s pie as well; as to be expected, under the terms of the settlement, Microsoft has agreed to pay their fees to the tune of $33 million dollars, plus costs, expenses and a $5,000-a-person bounty to the named members of the class.

I have to “admire” just how lucrative the antitrust racket can be. Manufacture an injury under the antitrust laws, create a class (however lethargic and unresponsive) and simply stand by to cash in. Why would anyone even bother defend the rights of businessmen when the real money is made in looting them–and the businessmen go along with it?

Nicholas Provenzo is founder and Chairman of the Center for the Advancement of Capitalism.

The views expressed above represent those of the author and do not necessarily represent the views of the editors and publishers of Capitalism Magazine. Capitalism Magazine sometimes publishes articles we disagree with because we think the article provides information, or a contrasting point of view, that may be of value to our readers.

Related articles

Misunderstanding the Meaning of a “Monopoly”

Misunderstanding the Meaning of a “Monopoly”

As long as government secures and protects private property rights, enforces all contracts entered into voluntarily and through mutual agreement, and assures law and order under an impartial rule of law, “monopoly” as an economic or social problem is virtually non-existent. But introduce government intervention into the market system, and monopoly invariably becomes a social harm and an economic problem.

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Pin It on Pinterest