The Edifice Complex

by | Apr 14, 2007

Why do we let politicians name buildings after each other? I understand building monuments to honor leaders like Washington and Jefferson. But monuments to current members of Congress? Haven’t we lowered the bar too far? Today all a congressman has to do to get his name slapped on a building is bring home enough pork. […]

Why do we let politicians name buildings after each other? I understand building monuments to honor leaders like Washington and Jefferson. But monuments to current members of Congress? Haven’t we lowered the bar too far?

Today all a congressman has to do to get his name slapped on a building is bring home enough pork.

Mississippi Sen. Trent Lott has lots of facilities named after him: a middle school, an airport, the Trent Lott Center at Jackson State, the Trent Lott Leadership Institute, and more.

West Virginia Sen. Robert Byrd has even more named after him. My show, “20/20,” discovered more than 30 buildings, a bridge, even a telescope.

This practice of naming buildings after living public figures is relatively new. The Lincoln Memorial didn’t appear until more than 50 years after Lincoln’s death. The Washington Monument came 89 years after Washington died.

One politician wants to stop such self-glorification. Dan Greenberg, an Arkansas state legislator, introduced the “Edifice Complex Prevention Bill.” It would ban his state’s politicians from naming buildings after themselves. “For me it just comes too close to using taxpayer money to build temples to living people,” he told me.

Arkansas politicians are as guilty as others in memorializing one another. The most recent former governor, Republican Mike Huckabee, who’s now running for president, has plenty named after him, and even his wife, Janet, has things named for her, like the Mike and Janet Huckabee Lake and the Janet Huckabee Nature Center.

What made Greenberg try to stop this nonsense was discovering that a park was named after him and some other legislators. One complained that the sign with her name didn’t use her campaign colors. “That was so distasteful, I just said to myself, ‘Enough!'” Greenberg recalls.

Other politicians sneered at his idea, and the Edifice Complex Prevention Bill was killed in committee 11 to 3.

In Jackson, Miss., such political egotism is controversial. Some people want a new federal courthouse named after one of Mississippi’s pioneering black lawyers, the late R.

Jess Brown, who defended James Meredith in his effort to attend the University of Mississippi and defended Medgar Evers, the civil-rights activist who later was murdered.

But Sen. Lott has other ideas. He thinks the courthouse should be called the Cochran Federal Courthouse because his colleague Sen. Thad Cochran got Congress to spend $100 million of your tax money to build it. That upsets Brown’s children, as well as others in Jackson who want to see the civil-rights fighter honored.

Sen. Cochran’s office says he’s too modest to comment about this matter. But Sen. Lott defended his effort, saying:

“Thad Cochran moved to the Jackson area at age 9 and adopted it as his home-making partner in less than three years in the state’s most respected law firm.

John Stossel is author of No They Can't! Why Government Fails — But Individuals Succeed. For other Creators Syndicate writers and cartoonists, visit www.creators.com.

The views expressed above represent those of the author and do not necessarily represent the views of the editors and publishers of Capitalism Magazine. Capitalism Magazine sometimes publishes articles we disagree with because we think the article provides information, or a contrasting point of view, that may be of value to our readers.

Have a comment?

Post your response in our Capitalism Community on X.

Related articles

The Young in America Turn Against Capitalism

The Young in America Turn Against Capitalism

If young people worry and wonder about their retirement future, their health care, and medical needs, their chance to afford a place to live, and a reasonable possibility for their lives to be better and more prosperous than their parents, it is precisely because government over the decades has either taken over or heavy- handedly imposed itself over all these and other sectors of the American economy — and brought them to financial crisis and imbalance.

The Justice of an All-Volunteer Military

The Justice of an All-Volunteer Military

The most equitable and just sharing of the burden of America’s military is assured by its all-volunteer nature, and that conscription would be inequitable and unjust.

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Pin It on Pinterest