Government Approved Relationships

by | May 16, 2004

Q: Dr. Hurd, on your article on gay associations, what reasons would you have if a person wanted to have an “association” with a parent, a sibling, a cousin or a minor? Where would you draw the line and what reasoning would you use to make this conclusion of yours? A: Don’t make this more […]

Q: Dr. Hurd, on your article on gay associations, what reasons would you have if a person wanted to have an “association” with a parent, a sibling, a cousin or a minor? Where would you draw the line and what reasoning would you use to make this conclusion of yours?

A: Don’t make this more complicated than it has to be. A person has a legal right to form any association that does not involve fraud or the initiation of physical force.

A minor is not yet capable of determining, for himself, what kind of association he wants and it is appropriate that an adult be prevented from exploiting his ignorance by imposing such an association on him. An association, especially a sexual one, initiated by an adult and imposed on a child is a contradiction in terms and should be illegal. It should be illegal because of its objectively unjust nature.

However, there is nothing objectively unjust about two adults forming a consensual, non-coercive association with each other, including a romantic one even if between two members of the same gender. One cannot rationally argue, “Well, if it’s OK for two men to get married then it must be OK for a man and a boy to get married.” This is preposterous and tantamount to arguing, “Well, if one controversial or unusual arrangement should be legal, then they all should be–merely because they are controversial or unusual.”

Legally and politically, it’s not the controversial or the unusual that should be outlawed. It’s only the initiation of force or fraud that should be outlawed. The moral and psychological dimensions of various human social arrangements can be explored and argued, but should be outside of the political context.

Today, however, our society has become so politicized that everybody wants a government stamp of approval. Instead, everybody should grow up. They should recognize that they do not need and are not entitled to a government stamp of approval, and leave government alone to prosecute fraud, violent offenders and terrorists, as well as uphold legal contracts and associations between consenting adults.

Dr. Michael Hurd is a psychotherapist, columnist and author of "Bad Therapy, Good Therapy (And How to Tell the Difference)" and "Grow Up America!" Visit his website at: www.DrHurd.com.

The views expressed above represent those of the author and do not necessarily represent the views of the editors and publishers of Capitalism Magazine. Capitalism Magazine sometimes publishes articles we disagree with because we think the article provides information, or a contrasting point of view, that may be of value to our readers.

Have a comment?

Post your response in our Capitalism Community on X.

Related articles

The Young in America Turn Against Capitalism

The Young in America Turn Against Capitalism

If young people worry and wonder about their retirement future, their health care, and medical needs, their chance to afford a place to live, and a reasonable possibility for their lives to be better and more prosperous than their parents, it is precisely because government over the decades has either taken over or heavy- handedly imposed itself over all these and other sectors of the American economy — and brought them to financial crisis and imbalance.

The Justice of an All-Volunteer Military

The Justice of an All-Volunteer Military

The most equitable and just sharing of the burden of America’s military is assured by its all-volunteer nature, and that conscription would be inequitable and unjust.

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Pin It on Pinterest