Whose Mailbox is it Anyway?

by | Aug 25, 2003

Recently, I fixed and painted my old and ailing mailbox. After sanding it, and applying two coats of primer and two coats of black paint, I affixed new numbers representing our street address. It would seem natural that I should maintain and take good care of my mailbox – after all it is mine, right? […]

Recently, I fixed and painted my old and ailing mailbox. After sanding it, and applying two coats of primer and two coats of black paint, I affixed new numbers representing our street address. It would seem natural that I should maintain and take good care of my mailbox – after all it is mine, right? Wrong. The U.S. Postal Service owns it.

That’s right folks. You may have paid for the mailbox. You may have installed it. You may have painted and maintained it. It may have your name and address on it, but you do not own it.

How do I know that you and I don’t own our own mailbox? Simple. I was recounting my weekend handyman exploits, including my mailbox painting, to a coworker when she asked if I had saved my receipts to submit to the U.S. Postal Service for reimbursement. I naturally asked why and she explained that my mailbox is actually the postal service’s mailbox.

She had been handing out a flyer for a school activity to a few of her neighbors. For those who were not home, she placed the flyer in their mailbox. A US Postal Carrier spotted her and followed her in his postal truck. He then confronted her saying that she could not place anything in a US Postal Service mailbox. My friend naturally pointed out that she was simply placing a school flyer in the mailbox of a few of her friends. The postal carrier’s response was instructive, “Listen, lady, your friends don’t own these mailboxes. We do.”

My coworker and I both knew that one cannot tamper with the mail. We all want the mail to be secure. But placing a school flyer in a mailbox hardly jeopardizes the security or safety of the mail. Moreover, tampering or stealing mail is a separate crime. Quite frankly, there is no sound reason why the Post Office has to claim ownership of my mailbox. All the behavior they want to outlaw (i.e. stealing mail, tampering with mail, sending harmful substances in the mail, etc.) is already outlawed without them laying claim to my mailbox and trying to control its use. I for one would prefer to have a school flyer or a community notice or even my newspaper placed in my mailbox. They wouldn’t get rained on and blown all over the neighborhood and there is plenty of space for these things and my daily mail.

My grandfather always told me, “He who pays the piper, calls the tune.” When it comes to my mailbox, I’ve been paying the piper – I bought the mailbox and installed and maintained it. However, the Postal Service is calling the tune – they control and micromanage the use of my mailbox. I would prefer to use my mailbox to receive my daily newspaper, school flyers and my small packages. But the Postal Service says no – only they can use my mailbox. How many mornings is our newspaper wet? How often does the school flyer get blown around the neighborhood? How many times have we missed the delivery of a package because we are not home? While it makes sense to use my mailbox to better serve my needs, I simply do not have the right under current law to make such choices. There is something wrong with this picture.

The Postal Service, and more to the point, Congress need to recognize that if it is our mailbox (and it is by any reasonable standard), it must be treated as our mailbox. Alternatively, if the Postal Service really wants to own my mailbox, I will consider selling it to them and leasing the small spot of soil on which it sits, and charging them for my maintenance of it.

Originally appeared in the Chicago Tribune

George C. Landrith is the President of Frontiers of Freedom, a non-profit, non-partisan public policy organization dedicated to protecting the constitutional rights of all Americans and restoring constitutional limits on t

The views expressed above represent those of the author and do not necessarily represent the views of the editors and publishers of Capitalism Magazine. Capitalism Magazine sometimes publishes articles we disagree with because we think the article provides information, or a contrasting point of view, that may be of value to our readers.

Have a comment?

Post your response in our Capitalism Community on X.

Related articles

Are the Democrats betraying Israel?

Are the Democrats betraying Israel?

Both Biden and his predecessor, President Barack Obama, promised that they had Israel’s back, but it now appears that they are painting a target on its back at a time of its greatest vulnerability.

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Pin It on Pinterest