The Balkanization of College Campuses

by | Jan 4, 2003

The New York Civil Rights Commission (NYCRC) has put out a report that documents how “little attention has been given to the color-conscious policies of the colleges and universities that permit or encourage, and, oftentimes, fund a balkanized campus environment.” The report is titled: “The Stigma of Inclusion: Racial Paternalism/Separatism in Higher Education.” In describing […]

The New York Civil Rights Commission (NYCRC) has put out a report that documents how “little attention has been given to the color-conscious policies of the colleges and universities that permit or encourage, and, oftentimes, fund a balkanized campus environment.” The report is titled: “The Stigma of Inclusion: Racial Paternalism/Separatism in Higher Education.”

In describing the objectives of the NYCRC, the Commission says when they formed, “The objective was to reduce an ethnically-polarized civil rights effort, to rekindle the spirit of multi-racial, joint action to defeat race-baiting hatemongering and the divisive forces of defeatism, despair and racial separatism.” The report, which surveyed 50 prominent colleges and universities, shows that college campuses are working in the opposite direction, promoting racial division, separation and segregation, all in the name of “diversity.”

The report shows these schools encouraging minority students to join ethnic organizations, to live in racially separated dormitories, and to participate in race-based cultural activities. This is done in the name of “cultural awareness,” which provide “support systems.”

Many of these programs stereotype minorities. For example, at Brown University, there is a Third World Center, which represents a commitment to “students of color.” They don’t explain why they associate students of color with the Third World, or why they would be more interested in Third World issues than any other issues. Minority publications and activities, in the name of cultural awareness, assume people of color are “different.”

Many of the programs also stereotype minorities as being educationally disadvantaged, needing special help. Special classes are given to minorities to help them make the transition from high school, assuming they can’t compete at a higher level. “The range of schools that offer these programs indicate that even at the most elite schools that presumably choose minority students with the most exceptional credentials, minority students are tagged as differently or under-prepared.”

In a two-page position paper summarizing the 28-page report, some of the most prominent minority programs found on campuses are listed:

“Colleges create special administrative positions and “minority” offices that strengthen separatist campus organizations.

Colleges organize separate events and programs for minority students, including, in some instances, separate orientations and ‘Minority Weekends.’

College-endorsed minority student organizations on campuses encourage minority students’ separatism, in an effort to promote ‘group-identity.’

Colleges target and treat minority students as in need of remedial services, just because they’re students of color on a predominantly white campus.

Colleges provide courses and departments with a politically-correct multicultural/diversity bent.

Colleges provide racially identifiable, ethnic housing on campus — sometimes with links to academic programs — that allow for the steering of minority frosh to racial/ethnic ‘identity’ dorms.”

The Executive Director of NYCRC, Michael Meyers, wrote about the study: “Through color-coding, (colleges and universities) have done a disservice to both minority and non-minority students. Separatist housing, stilted courses, and ethnic cheerleading programs disseminate poisonous stereotypes and falsehoods about race and ethnicity. They rob students of their individuality and limit interactions between minority and non-minority students, and promote and reward separatist thinking

Robert S. Sargent Jr is a freelance writer who lives in Western North Carolina.

The views expressed above represent those of the author and do not necessarily represent the views of the editors and publishers of Capitalism Magazine. Capitalism Magazine sometimes publishes articles we disagree with because we think the article provides information, or a contrasting point of view, that may be of value to our readers.

Have a comment?

Post your response in our Capitalism Community on X.

Related articles

Are the Democrats betraying Israel?

Are the Democrats betraying Israel?

Both Biden and his predecessor, President Barack Obama, promised that they had Israel’s back, but it now appears that they are painting a target on its back at a time of its greatest vulnerability.

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Pin It on Pinterest