Jenin: The Big Lie

by | May 4, 2002

As the Israelis were busy hosing pools of blood off the streets after the latest murder-suicide bombing at Jerusalem’s Machane Yehuda market, the Palestinian propaganda machine was busy churning out yet another Big Lie: the “massacre of Jenin.” Palestinian mouthpieces claim that the Israeli military killed as many as 500 civilians in Jenin, a stronghold […]

As the Israelis were busy hosing pools of blood off the streets after the latest murder-suicide bombing at Jerusalem’s Machane Yehuda market, the Palestinian propaganda machine was busy churning out yet another Big Lie: the “massacre of Jenin.”

Palestinian mouthpieces claim that the Israeli military killed as many as 500 civilians in Jenin, a stronghold of Hamas and Islamic Jihad. When the Israelis cleared the booby traps and allowed Western media into the city, the reality was different: a difficult door-to-door infantry fight; 23 Israeli soldiers fallen in battle; dozens of terrorists killed. No massacre.

When Israeli troops surrounded Jenin, it was widely reported by the Western and Arab media that the local terrorist commanders swore to fight to the death. Yasser Arafat, holed up in Ramallah but still pushing for more violence, had called for a “million martyrs” to march to Jerusalem — and Jenin looked like a good place to start.

There were important assets to be protected in the refugee camp: arsenals of machine guns and anti-tank weapons, a cadre of would-be murder-suicide bombers, and several dozen chemical labs where explosives for suicide-bomber belts were being manufactured.

The fighting went on for days. Many houses were booby-trapped by the terrorists who hoped to blow Israelis to smithereens. The Israelis repeatedly ceased fire and demanded that all civilians leave the area, but the top Palestinian terrorists, true to form, were using them as human shields.

If this action had taken place in Afghanistan, U.S. troops would have called in the “vitamin B”: B-1, B-2 and B-52 bombers. If it had happened in Chechnya, the Russian generals would have called in artillery and flattened Jenin, just as they did Grozny. Israeli tanks were there, and they could have shot straight into town and the refugee camp.

Instead, Israelis fought on foot, placing themselves at risk while trying to protect Palestinian lives. One fighter, reportedly a young boy, detonated a booby trap in a building already taken by the Israeli reservists; 13 were killed on the spot.

After the city fell, 1,000 Palestinian fighters surrendered. In any other place, in any other war, there would be no one left to surrender.

The Israeli army put the number of Palestinians killed in a five-day battle at about 200. The Palestinian and Arab media, meanwhile, cried foul in English while praising the “martyrs” in Arabic. Saudi TV raised close to $100 million in a Jerry Lewis-style telethon to pay off the families.

The Jenin “massacre” that never was is yet another Big Lie in the Palestinian PR campaign — a campaign that would have made Joseph Goebbels, Adolph Hitler’s propaganda chief, proud. And with good reason. Goebbels’s legacy lives today — from Damascus to Ramallah to Cairo.

According to a prominent Egyptian writer, the Egyptian press ministry was set up in the early 1950s by the East Germans who learned the trade under Josef Stalin, but before that, under Hitler and Goebbels. And communist archives in Moscow demonstrate that many Palestinian leaders were trained at the Patrice Lumumba University in Moscow and KGB camps in the Crimea, both temples of Soviet propaganda and subversion.

One of Goebbels’s contributions to the world of “black” PR was the concept of the Big Lie — repeating something so loudly and persistently that people begin believing it. Arafat, for example, often blames Israelis for using “uranium” shells against Palestinians, implying radioactive damage. President Bashar Assad of Syria accused Israel at the recent Arab League summit of killing “thousands of Palestinians a day.”

Arafat’s strategy is to turn Israeli Prime Minister Ariel Sharon into a war criminal, and to turn the West against Israel. Arafat wants to preside over his sheikdom of terror from behind a human shield of international observers. Then Hamas, Islamic Jihad, Tanzim and the Al Aqsa brigades will be free to continue killing Israelis while Arafat himself can issue periodic denunciations and maintain (im)plausible deniability.

To achieve this, Arafat needs the world to ignore the mountains of documented evidence connecting him beyond reasonable doubt with the terror campaigns of Hamas, Islamic Jihad, the Tanzim and Al Aqsa. He needs the U.S. government and the Western media to shut their eyes to his close links with Iran and Iraq. He needs them to overlook where the real massacres are taking place: in Netanya, Haifa and Jerusalem.

This is why Arafat invented the Jenin “massacre.” Why the Arab and European media hastily reported it is another question.

Ariel Cohen, Ph.D., is Senior Research Fellow in Russian and Eurasian Studies and International Energy Security at the Allison Center of the Katherine and Shelby Cullom Davis Institute at The Heritage Foundation.

The views expressed above represent those of the author and do not necessarily represent the views of the editors and publishers of Capitalism Magazine. Capitalism Magazine sometimes publishes articles we disagree with because we think the article provides information, or a contrasting point of view, that may be of value to our readers.

Have a comment?

Post your response in our Capitalism Community on X.

Related articles

The Young in America Turn Against Capitalism

The Young in America Turn Against Capitalism

If young people worry and wonder about their retirement future, their health care, and medical needs, their chance to afford a place to live, and a reasonable possibility for their lives to be better and more prosperous than their parents, it is precisely because government over the decades has either taken over or heavy- handedly imposed itself over all these and other sectors of the American economy — and brought them to financial crisis and imbalance.

The Justice of an All-Volunteer Military

The Justice of an All-Volunteer Military

The most equitable and just sharing of the burden of America’s military is assured by its all-volunteer nature, and that conscription would be inequitable and unjust.

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Pin It on Pinterest