Letters: “Innocents” of War new!

by | Sep 19, 2001

The so-called “innocents” of war Nobody now can rationally believe that Islamic terrorists will not use weapons of mass destruction against innocent people, weapons they have been busy acquiring. Terrorism of this magnitude will remain a serious threat as long as there exists governments — Afghanistan, Iran, Libya, Iraq, Syria, Sudan, etc. — that aid, […]

The so-called “innocents” of war

Nobody now can rationally believe that Islamic terrorists will not use weapons of mass destruction against innocent people, weapons they have been busy acquiring. Terrorism of this magnitude will remain a serious threat as long as there exists governments — Afghanistan, Iran, Libya, Iraq, Syria, Sudan, etc. — that aid, abet, and harbor terrorists.

It would be a self-destructive policy to primarily focus on the individual terrorists or their leaders, such as Osama bin Laden. Such mass murderers are easily replaced these days. Harboring anti-American terrorists is an automatic declaration of war against America.

The U.S. must now demand unconditional surrender of all governments that sponsor Islamic terrorism and then destroy — by whatever means necessary — those governments that refuse. It’s not about vengeance; it’s about justice and self-preservation. Those who oppose this policy on grounds that so-called “innocents” will be killed — an argument that would have saved Hitler — fail to recognize the nature of war and the gravity of the situation.

Since there are no weapons that selectively kill those directly responsible for terrorism, the U.S. can not be morally blamed for “collateral damage.” Such is the price one pays for having an evil government. It is the terrorist-sponsoring governments and those who have appeased them for decades that deserve blame.

Glenn Woiceshyn
Calgary, Alberta, Canada

Glenn Woiceshyn is a freelance writer, residing in Canada.

The views expressed above represent those of the author and do not necessarily represent the views of the editors and publishers of Capitalism Magazine. Capitalism Magazine sometimes publishes articles we disagree with because we think the article provides information, or a contrasting point of view, that may be of value to our readers.

Have a comment?

Post your response in our Capitalism Community on X.

Related articles

Memorial Day: What We Owe Our Soldiers

Memorial Day: What We Owe Our Soldiers

To send soldiers into war without a clear self-defense purpose, and without providing them every possible protection, is a betrayal of their valor and a violation of their rights.

The Justice of an All-Volunteer Military

The Justice of an All-Volunteer Military

The most equitable and just sharing of the burden of America’s military is assured by its all-volunteer nature, and that conscription would be inequitable and unjust.

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Pin It on Pinterest