Science
Pluto, Democracy and Science
Nicholas Provenzo | 5 January 2007
Science deals with truth and not feelings.
Science deals with truth and not feelings.
High School Physics: Grade F
David Harriman | 2 November 2006The irrational teaching of physics is detrimental to America's students.
Studies Prove: Part II
Thomas Sowell | 10 August 2006What is a mere meteorologist at M.I.T. compared to Al Gore and his movie?
Studies Prove: Part I
Thomas Sowell | 8 August 2006Many people who complain about the corrupting influence of money never seem to apply that to government money.
Where Science Ends and Faith Begins
Nicholas Provenzo | 22 January 2006'Intelligent design' is not science; it is faith, and it must be treated as such
Court Victory Against "Intelligent Design"
Harry Binswanger | 25 December 2005There was a significant defeat for the whole "Intelligent Design" movement today, when a Harrisburg, PA judge ruled against its being taught in the schools of a local school district.
The Killer Bug in the Space Shuttle
Steven Brockerman | 21 October 2005What were the lives of the Challenger and Columbia astronauts sacrificed for?
The Politics of Hurricanes and Global Warming
Walter Williams | 3 October 2005The politics of linking hurricanes to global warming threatens to undermine support for legitimate climate research and could result in ineffective hurricane policies.
"Intelligent Design": Religion Masquerading as Science
Keith Lockitch | 27 September 2005The central issue under debate is whether "intelligent design" is, in fact, a genuine scientific theory or merely a disguised form of religious advocacy--creationism in camouflage. Its advertising to the contrary notwithstanding, "intelligent design" is inherently a quest for the supernatural. No matter how fervently its salesmen wish "intelligent design" to be viewed as cutting-edge science, there is no disguising its true character. It is nothing more than a religiously motivated attack on science, and should be rejected as such.
Kant vs. Darwin: Creationism ("Intelligent Design") vs. Evolution is Philosophical Debate
Don Watkins | 8 August 2005As the evolution debate starts to stir once again, you might be wondering why a scientific question is of such concern to politicians, journalists, and religious leaders. The reason is that evolution versus creationism, or Darwinism versus Intelligent Design, is not a scientific debate (that debate has long been settled) -- it is a philosophical one.
Dollars and Crosses
- Jane Orient on Quitting Medicare
- Ayn Rand’s Essay “To Whom It May Concern” Now Online
- Uses and Sources of Gold
- New Book: How to be Profitable and Moral: A Rational Egoist Approach to Business
- Democracy and Self Determination of Peoples: Euphenisms for Mob Rule in the Middle East
- Private Schools for the Poor
- Holleran on Anti-Hero Worship
- Salsman on the Anti-Capitalist Conservatives
- New Website: Checking Premises
- Job Creators: Who Do those Immigrants Think They Are?

