Kyoto
The IPCC's Square Pegs and Round Holes
Edward Cline | 30 November 2009
Environmentalists, global warming advocates, and the government all have a vested interest in the 'truth' of catastrophic climate change.
Environmentalists, global warming advocates, and the government all have a vested interest in the 'truth' of catastrophic climate change.
Open Kyoto to Debate
Glenn Woiceshyn | 8 April 2006Kudos to the 60 scientists for criticizing the Kyoto Protocol as politicized science and calling for a public debate on climate science.
Kyoto's Next Step: Corporate America
Cheryl Chumley | 20 October 2004Just because the Kyoto Protocol hasn't been ratified in the United States doesn't mean both treaty and agenda aren't being pushed elsewhere.
Kyoto is Dead
Jay Lehr Diane Carol Bast | 1 June 2001The Bush White House rocked Washington, DC and the world on March 28 when it acknowledged it would take no action on the Kyoto Protocol, the global warming treaty negotiated in 1997 by the Clinton administration.
Bush Administration Must Say No To Jane And Kyoto
James Glassman | 16 March 2001Bush Treasury Secretary Paul O'Neill criticized Kyoto -- not because it's too tough but because it's too timid.
The Kyoto Protocol and the Carbon Tax: The Costly Politics of Global Environmentalism, Part 4 of 4
Fred Singer | 24 April 2000We also have groups with broader agenda, some of them open, some others hidden. The one-worlders see this as opportunity to strengthen world government. Global warming is of little concern to them except as a means of setting up UN bodies to supplant national sovereignty. A different agenda belongs to the anti-growth and anti-technology advocates who want to de-industrialize the United States and other developed countries.
The Kyoto Protocol and Emissions Trading: The Costly Politics of Global Environmentalism, Part 3 of 4
Fred Singer | 23 April 2000The U.S. Administration's strategy for meeting the other objection of the Senate is to rely on emission trading. In principle, trading should reduce the cost of complying with the Kyoto Protocol. But there's no guarantee that it will work for CO2 on an international scale.
The Kyoto Protocol's Endless Bureaucracy: The Costly Politics of Global Environmentalism, Part 2 of 4
Fred Singer | 22 April 2000The KYOTO PROTOCOL is not needed, is not effective in mitigating climate change (even if developing nations were to cooperate), is economically destructive, and therefore politically unacceptable. Yet, it has already spawned a large international bureaucracy -- even before being implemented.
The Kyoto Protocol: The Costly Politics of Global Environmentalism, Part 1 of 4
Fred Singer | 20 April 2000The KYOTO PROTOCOL is being advertised as an international agreement to reduce the "threat" of greenhouse warming to the global climate. As its framers and supporters phrase it, global warming is the "greatest challenge to human existence on this planet;" this conveniently ignores the challenges from nuclear war, terrorist attacks with biological and chemical weapons by rogue nations, and the perennial problem of poverty and social unrest.
Dollars and Crosses
- Jane Orient on Quitting Medicare
- Ayn Rand’s Essay “To Whom It May Concern” Now Online
- Uses and Sources of Gold
- New Book: How to be Profitable and Moral: A Rational Egoist Approach to Business
- Democracy and Self Determination of Peoples: Euphenisms for Mob Rule in the Middle East
- Private Schools for the Poor
- Holleran on Anti-Hero Worship
- Salsman on the Anti-Capitalist Conservatives
- New Website: Checking Premises
- Job Creators: Who Do those Immigrants Think They Are?
