Don't Lose Sleep over Deflation

Modern economists don't understand what deflation is or why, in reality, we have much more to fear from inflation.

After hearing the dire warnings of deflation that have become the standard talking points of most economists, American investors may be reaching for a bottle of Prozac. I believe that their anxiety is misplaced. Unfortunately, modern economists don't understand what deflation is or why, in reality, we have much more to fear from inflation.

 

Moderate deflation is actually the natural trend of a productive economy. If a producer can increase his output per unit of input, then he can afford to expand his market by lowering prices while still increasing profits. In that way, deflation allows consumers to buy items that they may not have previously afforded. It also promotes savings, which is essential for investment and capital development. (For a simple description of this process, read Chapter 5 of Peter's new book, How an Economy Grows and Why it Crashes)

 

Deflation is also the normal consequence of a contracting economy. In a recession, there is a reduction in the amount of goods and services available for consumption. In order to keep prices from rising (due to shrinking supply), the central bank should allow the money supply to fall in line with the reduction in output. Also, during an economic contraction, consumers put downward pressure on prices by responsibly selling assets to pay down debt.

 

Many economists mistakenly claim that the Great Depression of the 1930s was caused by a 30% contraction in the money supply. The truth is that all depressions are caused by the reversal of a massive credit expansion. The reduction in money supply is part of a healing process that brings the overall level of prices back to a sustainable condition.

 

Looking at today's situation, just because we have a few months of sequential declines in CPI and PPI doesn't mean that deflation has become a secular trend. Year-over-year (YOY) growth in the M2 money supply is 2%; therefore, since the money supply is still growing, we are experiencing inflation rather than deflation.

 

Considering that evidence of inflation abounds, the Federal Reserve has pulled off a good trick by convincing Americans that we are about to "suffer" through a protracted period of deflation. Why have we been so easily duped? In the past ten years, the monetary base has grown from $600 billion to $2 trillion. This expansion has accompanied a rise in the price of gold from below $300/oz at the beginning of the decade to around $1,200/oz today. The price of gold is the best arbiter for a currency's purchasing power. Therefore, gold is still telling us that inflation is eroding the value of our dollar.

 

Other commodities, like crude oil, are telling the same story. Ten years ago, a barrel of oil was trading for $25. Today, it is $78.

 

Since 2001, the US dollar has lost over 30% of its value against our largest trading partners and more than 7% of its value since June alone. These facts are causing the mainstream economists to wring their hands about deflation?

 

More recently, YOY increases in the CPI, PPI, and import prices were 1.1%, 2.7%, and 4.5% respectively. Even though these YOY increases aren't evidence of runaway inflation, they still can't be construed as deflation.

 

The truth is consumers should be allowed the advantages of falling prices. Aggregate hours worked are down 8% since their peak in March of 2008. Since the money supply should fall along with the decline of the number of people in the work force, price levels should be falling too. But that is not what we see today.

 

If the monetary base continues to stagnate and banks stop lending to the government through Treasury purchases, we could see a deflationary environment sometime in the future. But given the current policy drift, that scenario appears unlikely.

 

Even if deflation were to take hold, it would not be something to fear. Lower prices are beneficial for those who have been thrown out of work, and falling prices allow asset values to reach a level that can be sustained by the free market. The fact is that prices should currently be falling in order to reconcile the imbalances brought about by decades of profligate spending and borrowing. Deflation... I say bring it on!

 

But that is not what is occurring today. Because of the towering level of US sovereign debt, it is inflation that remains the clear and present danger.

 

The national debt now stands at $13.24 trillion - nearly 92% of the entire output of goods and services in the US economy this year. In its mid-session review, the OMB revised its 2011 federal budget deficit projection to $1.42 trillion, down only slightly from the $1.47 trillion estimate for this year's deficit. Given this intractable and unsustainable level of obligations, the last thing the Fed and Administration can tolerate is to increase the burden of that debt by allowing the money supply to shrink.

 

A reduction in the supply of money (deflation) would cause the cost of debt to rise. An increase in the purchasing power of money also means it is more difficult to acquire the new money needed to reduce debt levels. Conversely, increasing the supply of money (inflation) reduces the cost of debt. With these incentives firmly entrenched, the last thing Americans will have to "worry" about is deflation.

 

Given the obvious mathematics, one wonders why Treasury yields remain at historic lows. The bond vigilantes are indeed in a coma. However, despite the mountain of complacency that their slumber has inspired, this golden age of E-Z financing can't last forever.

 

Bookmark and Share

 

Michael Pento is Senior Economist and Vice President of Managed Products at Euro Pacific Captial.

Comments Subscribe to comments feed

You must be logged in to post a comment.
Shahid Insaf on 6 August 2010
Great article. The simplicity of the solution makes one wonder why the so-called experts on the issue do not ever get it. With an incorrect basic philosophy entrenched in reversed causality, even the simplest problems appear daunting.
Thumbs Up Thumbs Down
0
Luis M on 12 August 2010
I'm a small business owner, I'm already at cost If there is a deflationary spiral like in the 1970's aka Nixon era, the I'm out of business and the sales will go to companies overseas and increase our debts to foriegn companies..OK so me going out of business is not going to bring the country down, but I represent some percentage of the US economy eventually all that money going overseas is going to bankrupt the US.
Thumbs Up Thumbs Down
-1
Julien Couvreur on 13 August 2010
A side-note on terminology: I think it would be more productive to talk about economic "development" than economic "growth".

Development implies that the economic system adapts and becomes better suited to fulfilling needs, whereas growth implies that it becomes bigger. It's not clear why "bigger" would be desirable and what would be the relevant measure that should increase (GDP is certainly not it).
Thumbs Up Thumbs Down
1
total: 3 | displaying: 1 - 3

Post your comment

Please enter the code you see in the image:
  • email Email to a friend
  • print Print version
Michael Pento is Senior Economist and Vice President of Managed Products at Euro Pacific Captial.
Tags
No tags for this article
Rate this article
4.33
Contact Us
Contact Us