Q: Don’t consumers have a right to Microsoft Windows without Internet Explorer? Does not Microsoft’s bundling of their products (i.e. Microsoft Internet Explorer and Microsoft Windows) into one package disrupt a person’s right to only have to pay for products he wishes to buy?

A: No one has a right to buy whatever they wish, one only has the right to buy what others choose to voluntary sell to them. The terms of any trade must be agreeable to the buyer and the seller, or else a sale does not take place. If you don’t like Microsoft’s terms, then you are free to go somewhere else (like I did when I bought an Apple Macintosh and a UNIX server).

Morally, there is no “right to coerce” Microsoft to create, or sell, a product called “Windows without Internet Explorer” if Microsoft does not want to produce such a product. Unlike the “right to force Microsoft to obey ones wishes” the right to property is a legitimate right. Of course, politically this is possible; but, this does not make such an action a “right.”

The property rights to Windows and Explorer belongs solely to Microsoft and not to potential buyers, and certainly not to the U.S. Department of Justice. That Microsoft does not want to sell the product “Windows without Explorer” does not violate your rights one iota. There is no such thing as your right to Microsoft’s property. There is only the right to buy products that others wish to sell to you. If they don’t wish to sell you them in the first place, then you have no right to buy them.